Editorial ethics and policy
The publishers and the Editorial Board of the journal "Socio-Philosophical Aspects of Science and Education" are based on its Mission and the adopted Declaration of Ethics. The publishers and the Editorial Board of the journal are guided in their activities by the ethical rules and regulations set out in the Core practices and Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing, and the principles developed by the Committee on Ethics of Scientific Publications, and the Declaration of the Association of Scientific Editors and Publishers "Ethical Principles of Scientific Publications".
The editorial board is guided by ethical standards in relations with authors and reviewers, employees of the publishing house. Therefore, the editorial board of the journal relies on generally accepted standards of ethical behavior of all participants in the process of working with scientific materials.
The editorial board is guided by ethical standards in relations with authors and reviewers, employees of the publishing house. Therefore, the editorial board of the journal relies on generally accepted standards of ethical behavior of all participants in the process of working with scientific materials.
Responsibilities of the authors
The editorial board of the journal "Socio-philosophical Aspects of Science and Education" is based on the ethical principles of fairness, politeness, and objectivity. We expect the authors to comply with the following rules of ethics.
The authors of the papers submitted for publication in the journal "Socio-Philosophical Aspects of Science and Education" guarantee the originality of the articles. This means that the materials for publications are not under review in the editorial offices of other publications, and have not previously been published in their current or similar form. The authors confirm that their publication does not infringe on other people's copyrights, and guarantee the publisher damages in case of detection of such violations.
The recommended originality of the publication material is at least 75%.
The recommended originality of the publication material is at least 75%.
The authors are responsible for factual materials. The editors interpret falsification of data, unethical work with references and citations (excessive self-citation or "friendly" citation) as fraud. A violation of the liability rule may result in a refusal to publish. The author's articles may contain a point of view with which the editorial board does not agree.
Plagiarism in any form is unethical and unacceptable. The use of other people's ideas and materials in the article should be designed accordingly in the form of links to works and sources (for borrowed tables and graphs). Incorrect paraphrasing of the original work without specifying the original source is unacceptable. links to the source are considered as verbatim copying.
All incoming articles are checked using the "Anti-Plagiarism University" system. An article may be retracted if the author has made unfair use of other people's materials and cannot provide a satisfactory announcement to the editorial board. The article is being retracted in accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines and the Rules prepared by HENRI for the withdrawal (retraction / retraction) of the article from publication. This is announced on the journal's website, and the information is sent to the RSCI.
The authors guarantee confidentiality of information, non-disclosure of state or commercial secrets.
All incoming articles are checked using the "Anti-Plagiarism University" system. An article may be retracted if the author has made unfair use of other people's materials and cannot provide a satisfactory announcement to the editorial board. The article is being retracted in accordance with the COPE Retraction Guidelines and the Rules prepared by HENRI for the withdrawal (retraction / retraction) of the article from publication. This is announced on the journal's website, and the information is sent to the RSCI.
The authors guarantee confidentiality of information, non-disclosure of state or commercial secrets.
The authors are required to mention the financial and personal connections that are relevant to the publication materials.
Publication ethics requires that the names of all colleagues who participated in the development of the concept and work on the text of the article be included in the composition of the author's team. By default, the editors consider all authors' contributions to be of equal value. It is unacceptable to include in the authors persons who did not participate in the work on the article or exclude those who contributed to the research submitted for publication.
If the authors discover an error or inaccuracy in their article after its publication, it is urgently necessary to notify the editorial board of the journal "Socio-Philosophical Aspects of Science and Education". The authors are obliged to assist in correcting the error. In the case of a significant error, the authors are obliged to cooperate in the rapid retraction of the article. An announcement is posted on the journal's website, the information is transmitted to the RSCI and the database of HENRI's retracted articles.
The authors have the right to appeal the decision of the editorial board that rejected the article. To do this, an author who does not agree with the refusal to publish an article has the right to contact the editor with a written statement in which he must state the reasons for disagreement in a reasoned manner (provide the necessary theoretical and empirical materials, prove a conflict of interest or incompetence of the reviewer). The Editorial Board makes the final decision after reviewing the publication materials.
Duties of the editorial staff of the journal
«Socio-philosophical aspects of science and education»
«Socio-philosophical aspects of science and education»
The editorial Board of the journal "Socio-Philosophical Aspects of Science and Education" is guided in its activities by the principles of science, objectivity, professionalism, complies with the requirements of the legislation of the Russian Federation regarding copyright, plagiarism and ethical principles supported by the community of leading publishers of scientific periodicals, is responsible for compliance with ethical principles in relation to authors, reviewers, readers, publishers and the founders.
The authors of the papers submitted for publication in the journal "Socio-Philosophical Aspects of Science and Education" guarantee the originality of the articles. This means that the materials for publications are not under review in the editorial offices of other publications, and have not previously been published in their current or similar form. The authors confirm that their publication does not infringe on other people's copyrights, and guarantee the publisher damages in case of detection of such violations.
The recommended originality of the publication material is at least 75 %.
The recommended originality of the publication material is at least 75 %.
The editorial board of the journal "Socio-Philosophical Aspects of Science and Education" is responsible for decisions on publication or rejection of articles submitted to the journal. These decisions are based on the opinions of the reviewers (see the section "Journal Policy").
The Editorial Board of the journal "Socio-Philosophical Aspects of Science and Education" examines claims concerning manuscripts or published articles, complaints about violations of ethical standards in the evaluation, editing and publication of manuscripts. If necessary, the editorial board publishes corrections, clarifications, and apologies to readers. When a conflict situation is identified, the editorial board takes all necessary measures to restore violated rights, followed by informing the authors and all interested parties about the decisions taken.
The Editorial Board of the journal "Socio-Philosophical Aspects of Science and Education" examines claims concerning manuscripts or published articles, complaints about violations of ethical standards in the evaluation, editing and publication of manuscripts. If necessary, the editorial board publishes corrections, clarifications, and apologies to readers. When a conflict situation is identified, the editorial board takes all necessary measures to restore violated rights, followed by informing the authors and all interested parties about the decisions taken.
If significant errors, inaccurate information, and violations of publication ethics are found in a published article, the editorial board of the journal "Socio-Philosophical Aspects of Science and Education" retracts this article.
The grounds for retraction may be:
The editorial board makes a decision to retract a published article if there are sufficient grounds. The journal publishes information that the article has been withdrawn, indicating its metadata. A letter is sent to the databases indexing the journal stating that this article has been withdrawn, indicating the reasons for the withdrawal.
The grounds for retraction may be:
- illegal borrowing (plagiarism);
- duplication of an article in several editions;
- self-plagiarism with a large amount of repeatability of research results and text already published in other publications;
- detection of falsifications or fabrications of data;
- the discovery of serious errors in the publication that cast doubt on its scientific value;
- incorrect composition of the authors (persons who do not meet the criteria of authorship are included);
- hidden conflict of interest;
- re-publication of an article without the author's consent.
The editorial board makes a decision to retract a published article if there are sufficient grounds. The journal publishes information that the article has been withdrawn, indicating its metadata. A letter is sent to the databases indexing the journal stating that this article has been withdrawn, indicating the reasons for the withdrawal.
The Editorial Board evaluates manuscripts based on their scientific content, regardless of the authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, citizenship, and political views. The editorial board coordinates all changes in the article and its final version with the author. The publication of a text that is not agreed with the author is a violation of copyright.
The editors of the journal, having familiarized themselves with the original information contained in them during the review of articles, do not have the right to use it in their own research or for other personal purposes. The editor must refuse to work with the manuscript in the event of a conflict of interest resulting from competition, collaboration or other relations with any of the authors.
The editors of the journal, having familiarized themselves with the original information contained in them during the review of articles, do not have the right to use it in their own research or for other personal purposes. The editor must refuse to work with the manuscript in the event of a conflict of interest resulting from competition, collaboration or other relations with any of the authors.
Responsibilities of reviewers
A reviewer who believes that his qualifications are insufficient to review the submitted manuscript, or who knows that its timely review will not be possible, should immediately notify the editorial board and refuse to review.
Maximum objectivity is required from the reviewer when examining the manuscript. His decision must be reasoned. Any personal criticism of the authors is excluded during the examination. The reviewer is obliged to refuse to conduct an expert examination if for any reason he cannot evaluate the manuscript impartially.
If a manuscript contains borrowed materials that are not accompanied by references to the original source, as well as if it resembles another manuscript or a previously published article, or if there are signs of data falsification, fraud, or other ethical violations, the reviewer must inform the editorial board of the facts of dishonesty of the author of the reviewed manuscript.
Maximum objectivity is required from the reviewer when examining the manuscript. His decision must be reasoned. Any personal criticism of the authors is excluded during the examination. The reviewer is obliged to refuse to conduct an expert examination if for any reason he cannot evaluate the manuscript impartially.
If a manuscript contains borrowed materials that are not accompanied by references to the original source, as well as if it resembles another manuscript or a previously published article, or if there are signs of data falsification, fraud, or other ethical violations, the reviewer must inform the editorial board of the facts of dishonesty of the author of the reviewed manuscript.
Prior to the publication of the article, the reviewer has no right to use the information obtained during the review for personal purposes. If a conflict of interest arises as a result of competition, collaboration, or other relationships with any of the authors, the reviewer must inform the editorial board and refuse to work with the manuscript.
All manuscripts received for review are considered confidential documentation. The reviewer should not discuss with outsiders the materials of the article with which he works as an expert.
If you have any questions, please contact us in any convenient way.:
Phone.: (384-2) 31-15-86
Fax number: (384-2) 31-16-06
E-mail: ipk@kuz-edu.ru
Web-site: http: // ipk@kuz-edu.ru
Address: 650070, Russian Federation, Kemerovo region – Kuzbass, Kemerovo, Zauzelkova str., 3
Phone.: (384-2) 31-15-86
Fax number: (384-2) 31-16-06
E-mail: ipk@kuz-edu.ru
Web-site: http: // ipk@kuz-edu.ru
Address: 650070, Russian Federation, Kemerovo region – Kuzbass, Kemerovo, Zauzelkova str., 3
© All Right Reserved. My company Inc.
e-mail us: hello@company.cc
